Nationalism and Rightism are Incompatible

If we are to define "Leftism" and "Rightism" as existing on an axis consisting of two poles, with the Liberal extreme end being the closest to collectivism and the Conservative extreme end being closest to individualism, Nationalism would be far closer to Leftism than Conservatism. Nationalism is a collectivist impulse which transcends individualism and speaks to the Zeitgeist of the people, rather than to the needs and wants of the individual.
Nationalism is incompatible with the current rightist model. Rightism, in its championing of capitalism, cannot possibly address the problem of the dissentegration of community and social life as a consequence of the ubiquitousness of technology, immigration, individual liberation, and deterritorialization.
Ultimately, the philosophy espoused and championed by the Liberal, which aims to liberate the individual from the constraints imposed on him by society, is much more compatible with rightism than Nationalism is to rightism. You will always see an alliance between established Rightists and Liberals against Nationalism. Nationalism is a fundamental repudiation of several crucial concepts of Liberalism, such as the blank slate. Nationalists not only deny the existence of human being independent of their wider groups, but they go so far as to deny the existence of individuals themselves. All human beings are the product of an endless series of contingencies.
The problem with American conservatism is that it's conserving American liberalism. Liberalism itself allows too much permissiveness on individual behavior, which eventual deconstructs itself. Is there any wonder that the revolution of the 1960s happened in a country where everything is permissible? If everything is permissible, why not revolution against the order of society itself? Conservatives cannot oppose the collective action of revolution by this ball-pit of individuals because by doing so they would betray the very same liberal principles they profess to be defending. So instead of being the champions their society needs and taking a moral stand against advances made by agents of liberation, they rely primarily on reactionary impulses which lay dormant in the public at large to gain their political power, knowing full well that nothing will be done to halt, or even reverse, the spirit of liberation unleashed by the left. Conservatives are fundamentally liberals. Fundamentally agents of the liberation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is Cultural Marxism, by Thuletide

Image
Contents: INTRO PART ONE: Understanding Marxism – The True Purpose of Marxism – Proto-Cultural-Marxism: Race – Proto-Cultural-Marxism: Gender PART TWO: ‘Cultural’ Marxism – What is Cultural Marxism and where did it originate? – Gramsci – The Frankfurt School – Just a bunch of Marxist nobodies? – Lumpenprole Revolution? APPENDIX ONE : Marxism and International Finance APPENDIX TWO : Woke Capital Addendum: What’s in a Name? Preamble I’m sick of seeing so many r*tarded takes on Cultural Marxism. I’m sick of seeing midwit fart-sniffers acting like they’re bigbrained because they can point out the extremely obvious fact that (so-called) “Liberals” and our corporate overlords are (ostensibly) the primary drivers of cultural decay in the West. Most importantly, I’m sick to death of seeing everyone attempting to absolve the utter cancer that is Communism – a cancer that continues to spread, unseen by the uninitiated and the ignorant. I was going to publish this via PDF...
Read more

Why conservatives lose: Part 1

The problem conservatives find for themselves in the modern world is that identity has been rendered a consequence of performance. This is a concept which is primarily championed by members of academia, like Judith Butler, and has since been adopted by the rising ruling elite that is now beginning to seize the institutions of our society, from tech giants to government institutions. As a consequence of the atomizing effects of modernity, conservatives are finding it much more difficult to find people who are willing to perform the identity of conservative, as it was defined 50 years ago, or even 15 years ago. This is perhaps a chief cause of conservative left-ward drift. This tendency of conservatives to increasingly adopt the culture generated by the left. Being that the left dominates the culture industry, and thus, the range of identities people are willing to adopt for themselves, is there any wonder that conservatism is rapidly becoming obsolete? It has completely ceded ground on...
Read more

Hypergamy as a Basis for Mass Capitalism

-The id Human beings are fundamentally motivated by irrational, subconscious impulses. Chief among these impulses is the drive to reproduce. -Female Hypergamy Female hypergamy is a natural phenomenon found in the animal kingdom Hypergamy floats: Females will always pursue men above hem on the hierarchy, negating any conscious pretense they may have for equality. Children: The first property and the oldest profession (women sell their sexuality to men in exchange for resources) -The origins of Hierarchy and Competition Mass hierarchies are the natural outgrowth of intermale competition, which has its foundations in female hypergamic mate selection. Female mate selection and hierarchical structures are symbiotic. -Mass Structures Mass bureaucratic structures are an outgrowth of human desire to achieve biological needs, practical goods, necessities, and product. Mass structures fundamentally rely on underlying male participation in the hierarchical structures. Female n...
Read more